On the premise that blue-collar workers have shorter life expectancies than
white-collar ones, certain industries would be allowed reduce the amounts they
place into their pension funds under a measure making its way through the U.S.
House of Representatives.
For a Limited Time receive a
FREE Compensation Market Analysis Report! Find out how much you should be paying to attract and retain the best applicants and employees, with
customized information for your industry, location, and job.
Get Your Report Now!The change would let companies use recent actuarial calculations, which show
that blue-collar workers on average die sooner than white-collar ones. That
in turn would cut the amounts that companies must put aside under the law to
fund future blue-collar pensions.
One of the bill's co-sponsors, Rep. Ben Cardin, D-Md., said the idea has the
support of both workers and companies in "older" manufacturing industries.
"We've raised the issue for a good reason," Cardin told the Reuters
news agency. "There are plans that are funding at a mortality rate that
is not realistic for their workforce."
The United Auto Workers has no quarrel with the proposal, according to its
legislative director, Alan Reuther. "We think you ought to have assumptions
that reflect the reality about plan retirees," he told Reuters.
"If you over-fund a plan," he added, "you may be taking money
away from retiree health benefits, or money that is needed for investment and
plant, and without that money you may have a plant closing."
The proposal comes even amid increasing concerns about the underfunding of
defined-benefit pension plans. The U.S. Employee Benefits Security Administration,
formerly the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, says total pension
underfunding currently exceeds $300 billion at U.S. companies, and $60 billion
of this is attributable to the auto industry.
But Reuters notes that using different assumptions about the mortality of workers
could presumably have the effect of making some of these plans appear to be
better funded, by lessening their liabilities.
Cardin said he did not know by how much his proposal would reduce the pension
obligations of companies. It is part of a broader pension bill introduced in
the House last month by Cardin and Rep. Rob Portman, an Ohio Republican; it
is unclear when it will move to the House floor.
Links